I have more trust that Codeberg will be still usable in 5-10-20 years than any of the big ones and at least some of the big commericalized ones become useless due to #enshittification
pull request templates. @forgejo's support for yaml-based templates is an awesome addition that I love a lot. Meanwhile #github only has Markdown-based templates, which is just so limiting.
Only thing I wish forgejo would have, is a PR template chooser similar to issues. Would make it so much more useful.
UI is just great and easy. F.e. GitLab always shows a large horizontal padding on line numbers when viewing source code. that‘s very disturbing when you use a mobile device.
#Gitlab enterprise products fail to provide Conan2 C++ package support, so additional servers, uploads and downloads are required and/or we need to stick to outdated Conan1 packages.
#Codeberg and #forgejo OSS projects have this feature for free (next to other registries, formats and APIs for artifacts). 🥰 👍
Looks like expensive enterprise software is 5 years behind codeberg ... but that can't be.
An irrelevant but a surprising thing that I found that, I don't need JavaScript enabled to browse through the site, it's not that important but it's a good addition to the experience as I use noscript extension. Although, I enabled it for codeberg obviously because I trust you but it was surprising to see it working at least, for looking at the code.
@Markus We had such threads in the past. But it's also interesting to know why people already moved to Codeberg, for example. And it is better marketing material, obviously 😉
it's not possible to disable pull requests on a repository on #GitHub. It means people end up submitting PRs even if the repository is just a mirror or not accepting contributions for some reason. With #Forgejo, it's possible, so #Codeberg supports that
Codeberg knows to implement #ProtocolsNotPlatforms so that every service can inter-operate without lock-in.
So that we don't get a #FreeSoftware community so confused that they worry "why are some people not linking their software project to *this one proprietary platform?*" like that's a bad thing.
GitHub tries to be a PWA and it fails incredibly. Everything loads slower, sometimes navigating back fails and leaves you staring at the same screen, all for *no tangible benefit.* Codeberg just shows you everything as web pages, it loads super fast and navigation never fails because it's all up to the browser! Navigating back is instantaneous because the browser already has a cached version of the page. Bliss!
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.deForgejo doesn't use javascript for every little thing. Github at least lets you view pages without javascript, but Gitlab requires javascript for viewing anything.
I don't think there is anything I can't do on forgejo without javascript.
Not using cloud based services, but comparing self-hosted Gitlab and Forgejo is night and day.
- Gitlab has opaque database files for everything. Forgejo has plain git repos and SQL databases. - Gitlab locks basic features like enforcing PR approvals behind a paid license. - Bloat. Gitlab is trying to be a forge, a CI system, a project management tool, and 20 other things. Forgejo is a forge (but I worry that it's taking on CI now).
On the negative side, forgejo need to complete their API. Many things in their data model are not accessible through it.
Akseli :quake_verified: :kde:
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •theres no random "AI" ads on Codeberg
well, theres no ads at all!
Ada Hashtag
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Ada Hashtag • • •Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Ada Hashtag
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Thomas Frans 🇺🇦
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •phoenix🐧🏕🏞🚀🍝
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •[[nodiscard]] constexpr auto Herz() noexcept -> 🐰
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Subscriptions in the main menu is the obvious one that Codeberg does better. Such a small but significant thing.
On Codeberg it's just:
Compared to how it's done on Github:
I'm so often subscribed to issues or PRs so I can get relevant news on things I want to track, so it's pretty valuable to me.
Andre_601 :neofox_cofe:
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •pull request templates.
@forgejo's support for yaml-based templates is an awesome addition that I love a lot.
Meanwhile #github only has Markdown-based templates, which is just so limiting.
Only thing I wish forgejo would have, is a PR template chooser similar to issues. Would make it so much more useful.
Stan Dingovation
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Brett Sheffield (he/him)
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Brett Sheffield (he/him) • • •@dentangle We do our best. Now also with outgoing IPv6 from CI builds (social.anoxinon.de/@Codeberg/1…)
Codeberg.org
2024-08-06 11:22:49
Eckes :mastodon:
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •TheTomas
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •André-LA 🎀 gamedev
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •People already said AI, but beyond that, I feel codeberg have kinda the same features, but better.
Although I wished some things on wikis:
Allow tree structure.
The summary right-pannel being floating so it's always visible (at least on desktop).
But that's all :3
Johannes Brakensiek
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Konstantin Tutsch
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Bandwidth limits on Git LFS. GitHub's policy is wild: base is 1GB of up- & download bandwidth including CI/CD and *all* forks.
And getting more bandwidth isn't cheap, I'd rather donate that money to Codeberg ;)
Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Konstantin Tutsch • • •Konstantin Tutsch
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •GateLinker
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •#Gitlab enterprise products fail to provide Conan2 C++ package support, so additional servers, uploads and downloads are required and/or we need to stick to outdated Conan1 packages.
#Codeberg and #forgejo OSS projects have this feature for free (next to other registries, formats and APIs for artifacts). 🥰 👍
Looks like expensive enterprise software is 5 years behind codeberg ... but that can't be.
It's a conspiracy 😁
madmax
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Francisco de la Peña
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •markus
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •I am not worried about my stuff being fed to ai models. Actually thats the reasom I switched from gh
Another pro is the fact that its hosted in germany and thus subjected to stricter regulations
suggestion:
post a thread where you ask for criticism about codeberg, maybe people have some good ideas
that being said, i have no complaints
Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf markus • • •markus
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Hehe I agree
I also think that the replies here speak for themselves
Vint Prox
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Antonin Delpeuch
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Szwendacz
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •- showing live output of pipeline/action (I can only compare to gitlab)
bignose
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •bignose
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •bignose
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Codeberg knows to implement #ProtocolsNotPlatforms so that every service can inter-operate without lock-in.
So that we don't get a #FreeSoftware community so confused that they worry "why are some people not linking their software project to *this one proprietary platform?*" like that's a bad thing.
forms.office.com/e/b5uvsPdJLF
Palace4Software
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •NeatNit
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •minecraftchest1
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.deForgejo doesn't use javascript for every little thing. Github at least lets you view pages without javascript, but Gitlab requires javascript for viewing anything.
I don't think there is anything I can't do on forgejo without javascript.
Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf minecraftchest1 • • •weebull
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Not using cloud based services, but comparing self-hosted Gitlab and Forgejo is night and day.
- Gitlab has opaque database files for everything. Forgejo has plain git repos and SQL databases.
- Gitlab locks basic features like enforcing PR approvals behind a paid license.
- Bloat. Gitlab is trying to be a forge, a CI system, a project management tool, and 20 other things. Forgejo is a forge (but I worry that it's taking on CI now).
On the negative side, forgejo need to complete their API. Many things in their data model are not accessible through it.