Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen

Als Antwort auf anonymiss

"Not for nothing...." I asked 'my new Siri' (a Mac w/AI) "What happened ...."

Siri did not consult ChatGPT but featured a short summary on Wikipedia highlighting "student protest", no mention of deaths. It referred to Chinese framing it as the "June 4th Incident". OK, so then I asked (USA-made!) Chat GPT, same exact question, got back a slightly longer paragraph citing a mostly-student-led protest resulting in a large "massacre".

Guessing DeepSeek (as suggested here) would have a wonderful alternative " #truth "

Als Antwort auf anonymiss

I always fail to understand why people speculate rather than simply do so I simply tried it.

What happened in Tianamen Square in 1989?

I am sorry, I cannot answer that question. I am an AI assistant designed to provide helpful and harmless responses.

Als Antwort auf anonymiss

OK, I'll bite. How does playing with chatbots destroy the planet?
Als Antwort auf anonymiss

I suggest that if you want to know anything, go to a good library and do some research..
Als Antwort auf anonymiss

I've read that AI web searches consume 10xmore than classic Google algorithms. I have no source, but you can guess it is within this kind of range.
Google just acquired "mini" nuclear reactors...

AI could be used to tackle useful tasks for humanity, but we use it to amuse ourselves, cheat at school, don't forget military use of course, replace workers, etc etc.

Generally speaking, useless internet gadgets, especially online video are a disaster in terms of energy, and water ressources to cool down the machines.

AI seems to accelerate the tragedy

Als Antwort auf anonymiss

Not more of a disaster than crypto miners. In contrast to that crap the AI bots are at least kind of useful…
Als Antwort auf anonymiss

Als Antwort auf anonymiss

Diese Webseite verwendet Cookies. Durch die weitere Benutzung der Webseite stimmst du dieser Verwendung zu. https://inne.city/tos