Wikipedia is a problem for Musk/Trump. Not, as Musk says, because it's "woke." Because it's one of our last reliable tethers to a consensus reality. Therefore, an antidote to disinformation.
It's not making anyone money. It's not enshittified. Of course it's not perfect—it's an endeavor of imperfect cooperating humans. But it needs protection and support.
newsweek.com/elon-musk-takes-a…
Elon Musk Takes Aim at Wikipedia
The billionaire has become one of the most prominent supporters of President-elect Donald Trump.James Bickerton (Newsweek)
Jurarigo hat dies geteilt.
RonSupportsYou
Als Antwort auf James Gleick • • •Stefan Monnier
Als Antwort auf RonSupportsYou • • •Konfetti 🎉🐳
Als Antwort auf Stefan Monnier • • •Unfortunately #wikipedia doesn't really offer a neutral view of the world. Only about 13 % of the authors are women. There were projects to change it, but many women (including me) were put off quickly because of the behaviour of other authors & especially the admins. When you write an article about a woman odds are high it will be deleted quickly, bc it's not relevant.The idea is good, but the implementation is biased. #ProjectRewrite #feminism #GenderEquality
Jurarigo
Als Antwort auf Konfetti 🎉🐳 • • •Wikipedia certainly have problems.
RonSupportsYou
Als Antwort auf Jurarigo • • •Jurarigo
Als Antwort auf RonSupportsYou • • •You can read the discussion page, is quite absurd:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cas…
Talk:Casey Mongillo - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org