Good news and bad news. #Conversations_im 2.17.0 has support for emoji reactions 🎉 Since @Codeberg appears to be under constant DDoS attacks they have added pretty strict rate limits that the @fdroidorg build server keeps running into. 😞 Another build cycle just failed and it's unclear when 2.17.0 will be available on F-Droid. Maybe Codeberg and F-Droid can back channel an allow list or something? 🙏
Sorry for the inconvenience! We did mention here that we haven't changed any of our rate limits in response to the recent outages yet, so we find this kind of weird: social.anoxinon.de/@Codeberg/1…
(Regardless: @fdroidorg, feel free to get in touch with us so that we can work things out!) ~n
@grote This is interesting feedback. There have been no changes to the rate-limiting, and the last two changes over the past three months were always increases.
We have blocked several offending IP ranges. Is there information about which hosting providers Fdroid uses? @fdroidorg
You're fine! I didn't mean to come across as defensive either, I just wanted to provide some more context (that this wasn't an abnormally overzealous ratelimit - which seemed to be your assumption and would've been my assumption too). ~n
Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Daniel Gultsch • • •Sorry for the inconvenience! We did mention here that we haven't changed any of our rate limits in response to the recent outages yet, so we find this kind of weird: social.anoxinon.de/@Codeberg/1…
(Regardless: @fdroidorg, feel free to get in touch with us so that we can work things out!) ~n
Codeberg.org
2024-10-19 17:53:17
Daniel Gultsch
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •Sorry this wasn’t meant to be an accusation. I’ve been a very happy member for almost two years and will continue to be.
Build log says HTTP Response code 429. That’s literally all I know.
But if it's not intentional that’s even more reason for you and @fdroidorg to get in touch.
Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Daniel Gultsch • • •You're fine! I didn't mean to come across as defensive either, I just wanted to provide some more context (that this wasn't an abnormally overzealous ratelimit - which seemed to be your assumption and would've been my assumption too). ~n
P.S. Nope, definitely not intentional 😀
Codeberg.org
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •F-Droid
Als Antwort auf Codeberg.org • • •I think grote and hc already answered to one of you other posts.
But yeah, we'd love to get this out of the way.